Regulatory & Compliance Change
Use C2O to navigate regulatory change with decision ladders, escalation triggers, and minimal evidence packets.
Use case – Compliance / Risk Owner
Outcome
Compliance readiness is achieved on time with no critical audit findings, while SLOs stay green and decisions follow clear ladders.
Step 1 of the 3-step plan is to clarify the outcome using the Outcome Definition Worksheet for this scenario, then use the templates and playbooks below to run it.
Signals that matter
Each signal is backed by the metrics dictionary and the internal platform enablement case study.
Incident rate (audit findings)
Critical audit findings
Incident rate
Escalations per month
Decision latency
Cross-functional decision latency
Run this now
Move from reading to action with a small starter stack: one outcome worksheet, one contribution map, and two lifecycle playbooks.
Outcome Definition Worksheet (Compliance)
Define compliance outcomes, guardrails, and audit criteria for a change initiative.
Contribution Mapping Canvas (Compliance)
Map decision-makers, advisors, and enablers across phases for a compliance project.
Decide: Evidence & Governance Playbook
Design decision ladders, minimal evidence packets, and escalation triggers for governance-heavy work.
Run: SLO Policy & Audit Readiness
Operate with SLO policy gates, synthetic checks, and dry-run audits for compliance services.
Decision rights
Decision Rights & Escalation Triggers
Publish ladders and triggers so teams know when to decide locally and when to escalate for compliance and risk.
View Decision Rights hubCase proof
Before/after metrics and decision records from an internal platform enablement initiative.
Regulatory & Compliance Change
A cross-functional group used ladders, triggers, and evidence packets to stay compliant while keeping SLOs green.
| Metric | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
| SLO attainment | SLO risk during retrofits was unclear | Evidence |
| Decision latency | Decisions relitigated in meetings without thresholds | Evidence |